Cases 11 - 20 of 156,957
Merritt v. Mathewson et al
as 2:2024cv00397
Plaintiff:
Larry Bernard Merritt
Defendant:
John Doe Mathewson, John Doe Morales, John Doe Scarpatti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Mountain Progressive Ins.
as 1:2024cv01879
Plaintiff:
Norris Anderson, Jr.
Defendant:
Mountain Progressive Ins.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simmons v. Maddox
as 1:2024cv01880
Plaintiff:
Eric Simmons
Defendant:
Melody Maddox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carlton v. Wrozier et al
as 1:2024cv01881
Plaintiff:
Lewis Alan Carlton
Defendant:
KK Wrozier, City of Smyrna GA, Smyrna Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. USA
as 1:2024cv00062
Petitioner:
STEPHON WILLIAMS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21661
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
LEIGH v. HANCOCK STATE PRISON WARDEN
as 5:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
TREMAINE DESHUN LEIGH
Defendant:
HANCOCK STATE PRISON WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Battle v. Alabama, State of
as 2:2024cv00540
Petitioner:
Antonio Dentray Battle
Respondent:
Alabama, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RUMPH v. DIXON
as 4:2024cv00191
Petitioner:
TAVARES RUMPH
Respondent:
RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DAVIS v. FRANKLIN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION et al
as 4:2024cv00190
Plaintiff:
LLOYD ANTHONY DAVIS
Defendant:
FRANKLIN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, REGION 1 PHARMACY and FNU PAWKK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
