Cases 11 - 20 of 7,509
Vargas v. Ashland Federal Correctional Institution
as 0:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Javier Vargas
Defendant:
Ashland Federal Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Wellpath Corporation, LLC et al
as 0:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Carlos Harris
Defendant:
Wellpath Corporation, LLC, Dr. Kevin Smith, Summer James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Paris v. Mosley
as 6:2024cv00049
Petitioner:
Lamar Paris
Respondent:
Jamie Mosley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hargis v. USA
as 5:2024cv00098
Petitioner:
William Ray Hargis
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Forte v. North Point Training Center et al
as 5:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Montrail Forte
Defendant:
North Point Training Center, The State of Kentucky, Officer Chad Shearer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martinez v. Warden FCI Ashland
as 0:2024cv00042
Petitioner:
Jonathan Martinez
Respondent:
Warden FCI Ashland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bailey v. Jones et al
as 0:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Scott Bailey
Defendant:
Brandon Jones, Nathan Conley and Wesley Coldiron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rice v. Mosley
as 6:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Dayton Rice, II, Peewee and Dayton Ray Rice, II
Defendant:
Jaime Mosley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ford v. USP Big Sandy, Medical Director et al
as 7:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Samuel B. Ford
Defendant:
USP Big Sandy, Medical Director, Warden, USP Big Sandy, Albert Bourla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. Warden FCI Ashland
as 0:2024cv00039
Petitioner:
Kenneth Daniels
Respondent:
Warden FCI Ashland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
