Cases 21 - 30 of 10,151
Mandry-Mercado v. Commonwealth of Puerto Rico et al
as 3:2024cv01191
Plaintiff:
Javier E. Mandry-Mercado
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Victor Fingerhut-Mandry and Salvador Mandry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
COOKSON v. TOWN OF EASTBROOK
as 1:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
BRUCE COOKSON
Defendant:
TOWN OF EASTBROOK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
LIVINGSTON v. STATE OF MAINE et al
as 2:2024cv00138
Plaintiff:
JIMMIE LIVINGSTON, JR
Defendant:
STATE OF MAINE and US GOVERNMENT
Not Yet Classified:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - NON PRISONER IFP CASES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Brady v. Mosca, et al
as 24-1378
Plaintiff:
LISA MARIE BRADY
Defendant:
JENI MOSCA, PAMELA MACDONALD, JEANNE KINCAID and others
Kersey v. My Job Mobile
as 1:2024cv11081
Plaintiff:
George Kersey
Defendant:
My Job Mobile
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Joseph v. DHL Express (USA) Inc.
as 1:2024cv11048
Plaintiff:
Jefferson Joseph
Defendant:
DHL Express (USA) Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Donnelly v. Town of Scituate et al
as 1:2024cv11046
Plaintiff:
Matthew J. Donnelly
Defendant:
Town of Scituate, Maura C. Curran, Andrew W Goodrich and others
Interested Party:
Town of Cohasset
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morrill v. Beth Israel Lahey Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv11041
Plaintiff:
Catherine Morrill
Defendant:
Beth Israel Lahey Health, Inc. and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Johnson v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv01183
Plaintiff:
Obe E. Johnson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Howell v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority, et al
as 24-1368
Plaintiff:
CURTIS L. HOWELL
Defendant:
MASSACHUSETTS BAY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, MICHELLE WU and BOSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
