Cases 21 - 30 of 268
Johns v. Virginia Department of Corrections et al
as 7:2023cv00451
Plaintiff:
Lameek Shalam Johns
Defendant:
Virginia Department of Corrections, Harold Clarke, A. David Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franklin v. Ridge
as 7:2023cv00393
Plaintiff:
Saunders Franklin
Defendant:
Superintendent Luck Ridge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughes v. Pulliam et al
as 7:2023cv00384
Plaintiff:
James Madison Franklin Hughes
Defendant:
Richard Pulliam, Francis Barnwell, Donna Blanks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughes v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 7:2023cv00369
Petitioner:
James Madison Franklin Hughes, Jr.
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Allen v. Stokes et al
as 7:2023cv00361
Plaintiff:
Intell Jayshon Allen
Defendant:
Derek Stokes, Dr. McDaniels, Captain Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Mason
as 7:2023cv00280
Plaintiff:
Franklin Wade Davis
Defendant:
Sherie Mason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Mason
as 7:2023cv00257
Plaintiff:
Franklin Wade Davis
Defendant:
Sherie Mason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franklin v. The Commonwealth Of Virginia et al
as 1:2023cv00601
Plaintiff:
Delgardo II Franklin and Delgardo Franklin, II
Defendant:
The Commonwealth Of Virginia, Arlington County, Virginia, Tyler W. Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation (Excess Force)
Davis v. Bullen
as 7:2023cv00158
Plaintiff:
Franklin Wade Davis
Defendant:
Charles R. Bullen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tolbert v. Clarke
as 7:2023cv00130
Plaintiff:
Franklin B. Tolbert
Defendant:
Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
