Cases 21 - 30 of 40
Flemming v. Fischer et al
as 6:2009cv06457
Plaintiff:
Woodrow Flemming
Defendant:
Brian Fischer, Donald Selsky, Joseph Bellnier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neal v. Giambruno
as 1:2003cv00431
Petitioner:
Larry S. Neal
Respondent:
Michael E. Giambruno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Laws v. Giambruno
as 6:2003cv06142
Petitioner:
Ryan J. Laws
Respondent:
. Giambruno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mosley et al v. Travis et al
as 1:2008cv05268
Plaintiff:
Osiris Mosley and Robin Mosley
Defendant:
Brion D. Travis, Robert Dennison, Gould and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Flemming v. Fischer et al
as 9:2009cv00005
Plaintiff:
Woodrow Flemming
Defendant:
Brian Fischer, Donald Selsky, John/Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Brown v. Giambruno
as 1:2008cv00740
Petitioner:
Germaine Brown
Respondent:
Michael Giambruno
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Meyer et al v. City of Clearlake et al
as 3:2008cv04372
Plaintiff:
Grant Meyer and Marilyn Meyer
Defendant:
City of Clearlake, Allan McLain, Lee Lambert and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Medimpact Healthcare Systems, Inc. v. SXC Health Solutions, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv00590
Plaintiff:
Medimpact Healthcare Systems, Inc.
Defendant:
SXC Health Solutions, Inc., Richard Scot Giambruno, Thomas N. Tabback and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Jackson v. Giambruno et al
as 1:2008cv01621
Plaintiff:
Ronald Jackson
Defendant:
Giambruno and October 14-25
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Giambruno et al
as 1:2008cv01620
Plaintiff:
Ronald Jackson
Defendant:
Giambruno, Sara Gurwich and Daniel Warshansky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
