Cases 21 - 30 of 156
CORBETT v. FERNANDEZ et al
as 2:2022cv07397
Plaintiff:
MR. TERRENCE CORBETT
Defendant:
E. FERNANDEZ, S. TISCHIO, NUNEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv06979
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
BEY v. RAINS et al
as 1:2022cv06950
Plaintiff:
KHALID RASOUL BEY
Defendant:
WILLIAM RAINS, TASHA JIMENEZ and LAKISHA COLLINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
EZEANI v. N6094 JIMENEZ et al
as 2:2022cv05165
Plaintiff:
GREGORY IFESINACHI EZEANI
Defendant:
N6094 JIMENEZ, JANNELLE MALONEY, MARK RAMOTOWSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04136
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04133
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
KIM v. RIDGEFIELD et al
as 2:2022cv01680
Plaintiff:
SARAH H. KIM and H. SARAH KIM
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF RIDGEFIELD, ANTHONY R SUAREZ, RUSSELL CASTELLI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
v. BOROUGH OF RIDGEFIELD et al
as 2:2022cv01679
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF RIDGEFIELD, ANTHONY R SUAREZ, Russell Castelli and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
AGUILAR v. SEDCO CONTRACTING, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv01557
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER JIMENEZ AGUILAR
Defendant:
SEDCO CONTRACTING, LLC and JOSEPH SEDLAK
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
MALINCONICO v. ALESSIO et al
as 2:2021cv20117
Plaintiff:
DOMENIC MALINCONICO
Defendant:
ROBERT ALESSIO, ANDY JIMENEZ, ROBERT HERNANDEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
