Cases 21 - 30 of 142
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Employment)
USA v. 2448 W 6830 S West Jordan UT 84084 et al
as 2:2022cv00268
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
2448 W 6830 S West Jordan UT 84084 and 3179 Paintedhills Ave Las Vegas NV 89120
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 0881 Forfeiture Property - Real Estate
Jensen v. Joubert et al
as 1:2021cv00159
Plaintiff:
Gretta Jensen
Defendant:
Jon Joubert, David Gill, Jordan Burnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maese v. South Jordan City et al
as 2:2021cv00562
Plaintiff:
S. Steven Maese
Defendant:
South Jordan City, Johnny J. Serrano and Andrew E. Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
W. et al v. UMR et al
as 4:2021cv00028
Defendant:
Dignity Health Welfare Benefits Plan and UMR
Plaintiff:
Jordan W. and J. W.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
North v. Adams et al
as 2:2021cv00009
Defendant:
Matthew Adams and South Jordan City
Plaintiff:
Wayne Dallas North
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Bowser et al
as 2:2020cv00918
Defendant:
Christoper J. Ashby, William J. Bowser, Scott W. Beynon and others
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0077
Saari et al v. Subzero Engineering et al
as 2:2020cv00849
Defendant:
Subzero Engineering and Senneca Holdings
Plaintiff:
Rory Ricketts, Enrique Miranda, Christian Connor and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Viens v. Makin et al
as 2:2020cv00721
Defendant:
FNU Austin, FNU Crockett, FNU Olsen and others
Not Classified By Court:
Prisoner Litigation Unit
Plaintiff:
Gary C. Viens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jordan v. Powell
as 2:2020cv00457
Petitioner:
Michael Alan Jordan
Not Classified By Court:
Prisoner Litigation Unit
Respondent:
Robert Powell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
