Cases 21 - 30 of 262
Norman v. RK Holdings, LLP et al.
as 2:2022cv03704
Plaintiff:
Brian Norman
Defendant:
Rural King C, Inc., Shaun Amrine and RK Holdings, LLP doing business as Rural King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Feaster v. Chambers-Smith et al
as 1:2022cv00313
Plaintiff:
Terrance J Feaster
Defendant:
Annette Chambers-Smith, Ronald T. Erdos, Cynthia Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00838
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Harvey v. Chambers-Smith et al
as 1:2022cv00538
Plaintiff:
Norman Harvey and Norman F. Harvey
Defendant:
Jennifer Gillece Black, Annette Chambers-Smith, Mr. Gerren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. CR Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2022cv01469
Plaintiff:
Norman Adams
Defendant:
CR Bard Incorporated and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
First Financial Bank v. Vanessa Research Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00119
Plaintiff:
First Financial Bank
Defendant:
Vanessa Research Holdings, Inc. and Norman Gray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Troutman v. Davol Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00265
Plaintiff:
Norman Troutman
Defendant:
Davol Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wells v. C.R. Bard, Inc et al
as 2:2021cv05714
Plaintiff:
Norman Wells
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Russell v. CR Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2021cv05417
Plaintiff:
Norman Russell
Defendant:
CR Bard Incorporated and Davol, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
