Cases filed in New Jersey
Cases 21 - 28 of 28
BURKHARDT v. TOWNSHIP OF TOMS RIVER et al
as 3:2012cv07899
Plaintiff: PAUL BURKHARDT
Defendant: TOWNSHIP OF TOMS RIVER , MICHAEL MASTRONARDY , GUY MAIRE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DOWNS-SHEPARD et al v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2012cv05808
Plaintiff: ADRIENNE DOWNS-SHEPARD , ANTHONY CULLEN , BARBARA STANLEY and others
Defendant: BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY , ABC COS. 1-100, JOHN DOES 1-100 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. RANKINE
as 2:2011cv04050
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: KACY R. RANKINE
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
RENAISSANCE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. v. MID CONTINENT CASUALTY COMPANY et al
as 3:2011cv01391
Plaintiff: RENAISSANCE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC.
Defendant: MID CONTINENT CASUALTY COMPANY, RANKIN CONSTRUCTION, INC. and JOHN DOE CORPORATIONS 1-99
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Type: Contract Insurance
VARADI v. DC BOARD OF MEDICINE et al
as 1:2010cv03775
Plaintiff: ROSE ELSIE VARADI
Defendant: DC BOARD OF MEDICINE, GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, ADRIAN M. DENTY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
RANKIN v. GRONDOLSKY We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv03721
Petitioner: PRINCE ALBERT RANKIN, III
Respondent: JACK GRONDOLSKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv05423
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Labor Plaintiff
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:1997cv06184
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?