Cases 21 - 30 of 382
Watson v. Eason
as 5:2023ct03171
Plaintiff:
Brian Levar Watson
Defendant:
Charles Eason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WakeMed v. Willis Towers Watson Southeast, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00210
Plaintiff:
WakeMed
Defendant:
Willis Towers Watson Southeast, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Peoples v. Charlotte-Meck Police Department et al
as 3:2023cv00207
Plaintiff:
William Henry Peoples, lll
Defendant:
Charlotte-Meck Police Department, Public Defenders Office, State of North Carolina Judges and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00369
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Watson v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00519
Plaintiff:
Karen Watson
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
WATSON GUIDE IP, LLC et al v. ABSOLUTE DENTAL SERVICES, INC
as 1:2023cv00245
Plaintiff:
WATSON GUIDE IP, LLC and ROE DENTAL LABORATORY, INC.
Defendant:
ABSOLUTE DENTAL SERVICES, INC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Watson v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00502
Plaintiff:
Ricky Watson
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
GRIZZEL v. NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2023cv00335
Plaintiff:
PAMELA GRIZZEL
Defendant:
SURRY COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, SURRY COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, ABBY BISHOP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WATSON-DAVIS v. WILLIAMS et al
as 1:2023cv00318
Plaintiff:
JANELLE NICOLE WATSON-DAVIS
Defendant:
JASON WILLIAMS and SANTANDER CONSUMER USA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640 Truth in Lending
RICHARDSON-BEY v. SHELTON et al
as 1:2023cv00138
Plaintiff:
LEROY RICHARDSON-BEY
Defendant:
WARDEN M. SHELTON, SGT. WATSON, WARDEN BRAYBOY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
