Cases 21 - 30 of 908
Clark v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Lisa Kristine Clark
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Saunders v. Aramark workers et al
as 3:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
Quantel Omek Saunders
Defendant:
Aramark workers, Aramark supervisors, Capt. Hinchman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin et al v. Shelby Transport, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Stacey Lynne Martin and Daniel Joe Martin
Defendant:
Shelby Transport, Inc. and James Roy Frantz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Short v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
Nova Lea Short
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Nitinthorn v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Paul Saksari Nitinthorn
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Mallo v. Maston et al
as 5:2054cv00053
Plaintiff:
Farris E. Mallo
Defendant:
Russell Maston, Mrs. Kristen Nichols, Mrs. Nichols and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Linda Carol Scott
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Martin v. Ray
as 5:2024cv00018
Petitioner:
Randall Cedis Martin
Respondent:
H. Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Mallo v. Maston et al
as 2:2024cv00100
Petitioner:
Farris E. Mallo
Respondent:
Mr. Russell Maston, Mrs. Kristen Nichols, Mrs. Nichols and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Saxton v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
William Ray Saxton
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
