Cases 21 - 30 of 499
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00927
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
King v. Galipeau et al
as 3:2023cv00203
Plaintiff:
Timothy E King
Defendant:
John Galipeau, Warr, Timothy Darenski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holiday et al v. Atlantic Richfield Company et al
as 2:2016cv00525
Plaintiff:
Holiday, TJ 1, Sara Robeson and others
Defendant:
Atlantic Richfield Company, BP West Coast Products LLC, Hammond Group Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
King v. Whitley County Jail
as 1:2023cv00081
Plaintiff:
Nicholas E. King
Defendant:
Whitley County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KING v. BROADBAND OF INDIANA, LLC
as 1:2023cv00376
Plaintiff:
TONY WAYNE KING
Defendant:
BROADBAND OF INDIANA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
KREILEIN v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2023cv00143
Petitioner:
ALAN KREILEIN
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA, TRACY BERRY, LAURA KLOIMWEIDER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KING v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2022cv02459
Plaintiff:
SETH KING
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
King v. Brightmark LLC
as 1:2022cv00364
Plaintiff:
Douglas B King and Douglas B King, Jr
Defendant:
Brightmark LLC and Brightmark Energy LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
