Cases 21 - 30 of 315
Larson v. Kijakazi
as 0:2023cv00507
Plaintiff:
Scott Dean Larson
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Larson v. Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc.
as 0:2023cv00201
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Larson
Defendant:
Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Yaritz v. Underwriter of Rush City/Moose Lake et al
as 0:2023cv00049
Plaintiff:
Harold Yaritz
Defendant:
Underwriter of Rush City/Moose Lake, Paul Schnell, Michelle Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bakambia v. Craane et al
as 0:2022cv02922
Plaintiff:
Marc Amouri Bakambia
Defendant:
Stephen Craane, Tim Walz, Luke Dehaan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Specht et al v. Cargill, Incorporated et al
as 0:2022cv02903
Plaintiff:
James Specht, Jerry Kelsey and Tad Larson
Defendant:
Cargill, Inc., JBS USA Food Company, Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Larson et al v. Blosberg et al
as 0:2022cv02861
Plaintiff:
Michael Larson and Susan Larson
Defendant:
Dean Blosberg and Andrea Blosberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv02584
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Husten v. Collins et al
as 0:2022cv02347
Petitioner:
Michael John Husten
Respondent:
Brian Collins, Paul Schnell and Rebecca Holmes-Larson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Yaritz v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2022cv02320
Plaintiff:
Harold David Yaritz
Defendant:
State of Minnesota and Nan Larson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Larson v. Walgreens Co
as 0:2022cv02262
Plaintiff:
Jean Larson
Defendant:
Walgreens Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
