Cases 21 - 30 of 765
Ruiz v. Morales et al
as 2:2023cv02263
Plaintiff:
Martin Moreno Ruiz
Defendant:
Luz Maria Aguilar Morales, Eduardo Tomas Medina Mora Icaza, Lilia Monica Lopez Benitez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lopez v. Landcare Unlimited LLC et al
as 2:2023cv02210
Plaintiff:
Jesus Lopez
Defendant:
Landcare Unlimited LLC and Timothy Blake
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01915
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01776
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Granados #280949 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2023cv01635
Plaintiff:
Crispin Granados
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell, Daniel Carol A, Ingrid G Van Winkle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Long v. Lopez et al
as 2:2023cv01610
Plaintiff:
DeWitt Lamar Long
Defendant:
M Lopez, Unknown Quan, T Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos v. JALAV Restoration LLC et al
as 2:2023cv01480
Plaintiff:
Amadeo Lopez Ramos
Defendant:
JALAV Restoration LLC, Veronica Santacruz and Unknown Santacruz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01440
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lopez v. Marschke et al
as 3:2023cv08305
Plaintiff:
Shaun A Lopez
Defendant:
R Marschke, Diane Miller and GEO Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lopez v. Marschke et al
as 3:2023cv08300
Plaintiff:
Cesar C Lopez
Defendant:
R Marschke, Diane Miller and GEO Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
