Cases 21 - 30 of 197
Meyers v. Warden et al
as 7:2023cv00345
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Warden, Harold Clarke and Kyle Rosch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. USA
as 3:2023cv00373
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Meyers v. Clarke et al
as 7:2023cv00160
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, U.S. District Court Roanoke Division, Elizabeth Dillon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Clarke et al
as 2:2023cv00022
Petitioner:
David Meyers
Respondent:
Harold Clarke and Kyle Rosch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Meyers v. Connor et al
as 2:2023cv00063
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Patricia Connor, Amanda Bryan, Roger Gregory and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2022cv00739
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Schmaltz v. Clarke et al
as 1:2022cv01107
Petitioner:
Jeremy Jonathan Schmaltz
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke and Thomas F. Meyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00409
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Petersburg Circuit Court et al
as 2:2022cv00356
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Petersburg Circuit Court, Martin Bryant, Sean Vancampen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodhouse v. City of Virginia Beach et al
as 2:2022cv00328
Plaintiff:
Ashley Dallas Woodhouse
Defendant:
City of Virginia Beach, Eric Woodhouse, Fredrick McPherson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
