Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 1,629
Cantu Vela v. Lumpkin
as 7:2024cv00149
Petitioner: Horacio Cantu Vela
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United States of America v. Cantu-Lopez
as 24-2190
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: PAULA EULOJIA CANTU-LOPEZ
Mavani
as 3:2024cv00860
Not Yet Classified: William Kelly and Deborah Johns
Plaintiff: Attorney Zohra Mavani
Defendant: Ryan Cantu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Davis v. Stidham et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00105
Plaintiff: Lance Davis
Defendant: Brett Stidham, Alejandra Najera, Frankie Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Cantu v. The Geo Group, Inc. et al
as 7:2024cv00133
Plaintiff: Ivar Cantu
Defendant: The Geo Group, Inc. and Jaime Gomez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Cantu v. McCoy
as 2:2024cv00620
Plaintiff: Vincent Manuel Cantu
Defendant: Eric McCoy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Gamboa
as 4:2024cv01168
Plaintiff: Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant: Maria A. Gamboa a/k/a Maria A. Cantu and d/b/a Micheladas El Norte
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01036
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Austin et al v. Novo Nordisk, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01149
Plaintiff: Tommie Austin, Paulsen Bronston, Patricia Brooks and others
Defendant: NOVO NORDISK INC., NOVO NORDISK PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES L.P., NOVO NORDISK RESEARCH CENTER SEATTLE INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00033
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?