Cases 21 - 30 of 230
Nunez v. Bentivegna et al
as 1:2022cv05673
Plaintiff:
Toby Nunez
Defendant:
Dr. Robert Bentivegna, Kyoung S. Kim, Mary Ashong and others
Interested Party:
NEW YORK STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL OFFICE-GENERIC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Doe et al
as 2:2022cv00017
Plaintiff:
Terry Smith
Defendant:
John Doe, P.O. Suprina, P.O. Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keller v. Degirolamo et al
as 2:2021cv06711
Plaintiff:
Almalick Keller
Defendant:
Joseph Degirolamo, Det Louis Scarpati, S. Carey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Finger v. Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP et al
as 1:2021cv09612
Plaintiff:
Susan Finger
Defendant:
Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP, Arthur P. Brazy, Jr., Keith Benson and others
Shea v. Town of Middletown et al
as 1:2021cv05733
Plaintiff:
Sean Shea
Defendant:
Town of Middletown, Carl Davis, Hiram Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shea v. Town of Middletown et al
as 3:2021cv01311
Plaintiff:
Sean Shea
Defendant:
Town of Middletown, Carl Davis, Hiram Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boulanger v. Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP et al
as 1:2021cv08298
Plaintiff:
Robert Boulanger
Defendant:
Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP, Arthur Brazy, Jr., Steven Sonnenstein and others
Carey v. Passage
as 1:2021cv07497
Petitioner:
Hubert Carey
Respondent:
Supt. Passage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv05048
Plaintiff:
Carey Jerome Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Bianco et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran
as 1:2020cv10902
Plaintiff:
Maureen Reed, Winsome Nelson Reid, Doris McCloud and others
Defendant:
Islamic Republic of Iran
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
