Cases 21 - 30 of 744
Hiatt v. Grange Property & Casualty Company et al
as 2:2023cv00165
Counter Defendant:
Danielle L. Hiatt
Defendant:
Grange Property & Casualty Insurance Company, Grange Indemnity Insurance Company and Grange Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Dispute
White v. Akers
as 5:2023cv00330
Plaintiff:
Anu White
Defendant:
Daniel Akers and Damon Hininger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pryor et al v. Anderson et al
as 4:2023cv00125
Plaintiff:
Judy A. Pryor and Arnold L. Pryor
Defendant:
Daniel D. Anderson and Orthopaedic Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
White v. Akers
as 1:2023cv00160
Plaintiff:
Anu White
Defendant:
Warden Daniel Akers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cobble v. Beshear et al
as 3:2023cv00576
Plaintiff:
Daniel Cobble
Defendant:
Andy Beshear, Bobbie Holsclaw, David James and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal - Suit against Federal Officer
Cameron v. Novo Nordisk Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00066
Defendant:
Evernorth Health, Inc., Novo Nordisk Inc., Eli Lilly & Company and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Cameron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Zulawski v. USA
as 3:2023cv00063
Petitioner:
Daniel J. Zulawski
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Washington v. Cameron
as 3:2023cv00502
Plaintiff:
Robbie Washington
Defendant:
Daniel Cameron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Vaughn v. Akers et al
as 5:2023cv00260
Plaintiff:
David Paul Vaughn
Defendant:
Sgt. Daniel Akers, Sgt. C. Griffin, Officer Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vaughn v. Akers et al
as 3:2023cv00472
Plaintiff:
David Paul Vaughn
Defendant:
Daniel Akers, Sgt. C. Griffin, C/O Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
