Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Smith v. McMahon et al
as 1:2015cv01833
Defendant:
Klamath County, Gale McMahon and Jim Nielsen
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Mark Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rawson v. McMahon et al
as 1:2015cv01554
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Rawson
Defendant:
KCAC Gale McMahon, Klamath County Animal Control and Klamath County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Todd v. KCAC et al
as 1:2015cv01210
Defendant:
KCAC, Gale A McMahn and Dr. Dean Wilson
Plaintiff:
John H Todd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Todd v. McMahn et al
as 1:2015cv01211
Defendant:
Klamath County Animal Control and Gale A McMahn
Plaintiff:
John H Todd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Todd v. McMahn et al
as 1:2015cv01091
Defendant:
Klamath County, Klamath County Animal Control and Gale A McMahn
Plaintiff:
John H Todd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01155
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Kelly v. Abel et al
as 3:2011cv01178
Defendant:
Gregory E. Abel, Wedge Abels, Shane E. Abma and others
503) 296-5762 (fax:
Roberta Kelly
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Haney v. Blumenauer et al
as 3:2011cv00989
Defendant:
Gregory E Abel, Wedge Abels, Sam Adams and others
Plaintiff:
Azonia Haney
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Waldon v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 3:2010cv06087
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Gale G. Waldon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Teeters v. State of Oregon
as 3:2008cv00729
Petitioner:
Gale Lee Teeters
Respondent:
State of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
