Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Bailey v. Lockett et al
as 5:2014cv00563
Plaintiff:
Marcus Leanders Bailey
Defendant:
Charles Lockett, FNU Ndife, Michael Gilbert and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
EL-ALAMIN v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2014cv00149
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, FIRST NAME UNKNOWN NDIFE and others
Plaintiff:
MALIK AL-MUSTAFA EL-ALAMIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Booker v. Cintron et al
as 5:2014cv00274
Plaintiff:
Joseph Booker
Defendant:
Miguel Cintron, Alex Seda, Crystal Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Marcus Bailey v. Warden, et al
as 14-10310
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARCUS LEANDER BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN, NDIFE, Mrs., Medical Administrator, C. JONES, Officer and others
Bailey v. Lockett et al
as 5:2013cv00563
Plaintiff:
Marcus Leanders Bailey
Defendant:
Charles L. Lockett, Mrs. Ndife, C. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bailey v. Charles L. Locket et al
as 5:2013cv00542
Plaintiff:
Marcus L. Bailey
Defendant:
Charles L. Locket, FNU Ndife, J. Phelps and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Joseph Booker v. Julie Beighley, et al
as 12-2898
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH BOOKER
Defendant - Appellee:
JULIE BEIGHLEY, Health Service Administrator, ANDREW NDIFE, Assistant Health Service Administrator, WILLIAM WILSON, Doctor, Medical Doctor - Clinical Director and others
BOOKER v. BEIGHLEY et al
as 2:2012cv00153
Defendant:
THOMAS BAILEY, JULIE BEIGHLEY, CHARLES L. LOCKETT and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH BOOKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
GABALDON v. NDIFE et al
as 2:2010cv00281
Plaintiff:
FRANK GABALDON
Defendant:
Z. NDIFE and T. WEBSTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Duran v. Grondolsky et al
as 6:2008cv00387
Plaintiff:
David Duran
Defendant:
J. Grondolsky, Timothy Stewart, Luis Cordero and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
