Cases 21 - 30 of 1,524
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. Clark et al
as 3:2024cv00274
Plaintiff:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Defendant:
Alvin "Ted" Clark, J. W. C., C. R. B. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Hodges v. Beo
as 3:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
Michael P. Hodges
Defendant:
Brittney Lynn Beo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Trademark Infringement
Hodges v. Henrico County Risk Management et al
as 3:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
Michael P. Hodges
Defendant:
Henrico County Risk Management and Bradley Randall Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv00574
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Porter v. Lampman et al
as 1:2024cv00602
Plaintiff:
Tremaine Porter
Defendant:
P. Lampman, Joshua Branch and B. Springs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv00528
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hodges v. Harris
as 3:2024cv00238
Plaintiff:
Michael P. Hodges
Defendant:
Kiara Schirrae and Kiara Schirrae Harris
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Butts v. Fulton et al
as 1:2024cv00491
Plaintiff:
Corey lee Butts
Defendant:
Junius P. Fulton, III and Katherine M. Beye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv00459
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Woodson v. Summers et al
as 7:2024cv00195
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Harry Woodson, Jr.
Defendant:
L. Summers, Ms. P. Adams, Ms. Church and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
