Cases 21 - 30 of 41
Morales Jr., v. Katzmann et al
as 1:2015cv12946
Plaintiff:
Miguel Angel Morales Jr.
Defendant:
Meade, Rubin, Linda Giles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cordero v. Dickhaut et al
as 1:2014cv13553
Plaintiff:
Alex Cordero
Defendant:
Thomas Dickhaut, Bruce Gelb, Mark Reilly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony v. Symmons Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv11445
Plaintiff:
James Anthony
Defendant:
Symmons Industries, Inc. , Timothy O'Keefe , Jeffrey Reilly and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Baams v. Coakley et al
as 1:2013cv13115
Plaintiff:
Ronny Baams, Jr.
Defendant:
Martha Coakley, Peter A. Pepe, Bruce Gelb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv30067
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Tatum v. Lewis et al
as 1:2010cv10716
Plaintiff:
Richard G. Tatum
Defendant:
James M. Lewis, Thelma Sullivan, Joseph A. Enriquez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vandette v. Fisher et al
as 1:2010cv10423
Plaintiff:
Patricia Vandette
Defendant:
Mark Fisher , Edward Vandette , Michael Gould and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Bliss et al v. Fisher et al
as 1:2010cv10252
Plaintiff:
Bruce Bliss, Bruce Gebhardt and Richard Shaw
Defendant:
Mark Fisher, Mark Fisher, John Rhyno and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Sweetland v. Fisher et al
as 1:2010cv10029
Plaintiff:
David I Sweetland
Defendant:
Mark Fisher, Mark Fisher, James Moynihan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Reilly v. US Airways, Inc.
as 1:2010cv10003
Plaintiff:
Brian C Reilly
Defendant:
US Airways, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
