Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 856
TURNER v. RULE
as 2:2024cv00023
Petitioner: BERNARD TURNER
Respondent: T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Nelson v. UnitedHealth Group, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00010
Plaintiff: Annmarie Nelson
Defendant: UnitedHealth Group, Inc., Golden Rule Insurance Company, Regional Medical Laboratory, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
IRVING v. RULE
as 2:2024cv00014
Petitioner: DEJON IRVING
Respondent: T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
USA v. Rule
as 24-60015
Plaintiff / Appellee: United States of America
Defendant / Appellant: Quintaurus S. Rule
CARR v. RULE
as 2:2024cv00002
Petitioner: TIMOTHY CARR
Respondent: T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
CLARK v. RULE
as 2:2024cv00003
Petitioner: IZIAH CLARK
Respondent: T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
WILLIAMS v. RULE
as 2:2024cv00006
Petitioner: CHRISTOPHER L. WILLIAMS
Respondent: T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
CROSS v. RULES
as 2:2024cv00004
Petitioner: ANTON CROSS
Respondent: T. RULES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
SWADER v. RULE
as 2:2023cv00585
Petitioner: SWADER and KHALIL ANTONIO SWADER
Respondent: T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Nath et al v UnitedHealthcare et al
as 2:2023cv00245
Defendant: Assurance IQ LLC Agent, UnitedHealthcare doing business as Golden Rule Insurance Company, Assurance IQ LLC and others
Plaintiff: Essie Nath and Keith Nath
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?