Cases 21 - 30 of 370
CASTRO-MOTA v. MIESEL, ET AL
as 2:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
SANTOS CASTRO-MOTA
Defendant:
WARDEN DALE MIESEL, CO. and SUPERINTENDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
CASTRO-MOTA v. SCHOPPE et al
as 2:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
SANTOS CASTRO-MOTA
Defendant:
WILLIAM SCHOPPE and C.O. OFFICER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Santos v. Novo Nordisk Inc., et al
as 2:2024cv00696
Plaintiff:
Jocelyn Santos
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC., NOVO NORDISK US COMMERCIAL HOLDINGS INC., NOVO NORDISK US HOLDINGS INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Santos v. Unknown Respondent
as 1:2024cv00182
Petitioner:
Andreuris Santos
Respondent:
Unknown Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MOTA v. LOVERIDGE et al
as 2:2023cv02053
Plaintiff:
SANTOS CASTRO MOTA
Defendant:
WARDEN LESLIE LOVERIDGE, CAPT. MILLARD, SGT. COOK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MOTA v. COOK et al
as 2:2023cv01920
Plaintiff:
SANTOS CASTRO MOTA
Defendant:
SGT. D. COOK, M. BLOTZER, CO J. SUNSERI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MOTA v. COOK et al
as 2:2023cv04232
Plaintiff:
SANTOS CASTRO MOTA
Defendant:
SGT. D. COOK, M. BLOTZER, CO J. SUNSERI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03950
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01542
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (IMMIGRATION)
MOTA v. SPITZ et al
as 2:2023cv01604
Plaintiff:
SANTOS CASTRO MOTA
Defendant:
MICHAEL J SPITZ, OFFICER C.O. D.O.C. and MICHAEL J. SPITZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
