Cases filed in Michigan
Cases 21 - 30 of 1,782
Roddis
as 2:2024mc50614
Unknown: Robert W. Roddis
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Wheeler v. Joseph et al
as 4:2024cv11259
Plaintiff: Daniel W. Wheeler
Defendant: Joseph and Wellpath Health
Jones #162751 v. Berghuis We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00473
Petitioner: John W. Jones #162751
Respondent: Mary Berghuis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Key v. Aldi Sud KG et al
as 4:2024cv11188
Plaintiff: Kelly Royce Key
Defendant: Aldi Sud KG, Save-A-Lot and A&W Food Center
232 W Mason LLC v. Jackson, City of, et al
as 2:2024cv11051
Plaintiff: 232 W MASON LLC and 232 West Mason LLC
Defendant: City of Jackson, a municipal corporation, Matthew Hagerty, Mark M. Porterfield and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Berryman v. Deluca et al
as 2:2024cv11038
Plaintiff: Philip W. Berryman
Defendant: Tiffany Deluca, Labron, George Stephenson and others
Jaber v. 35th District Court et al
as 2:2024cv10790
Plaintiff: Sundus Jaber
Defendant: 35th District Court, Regional Managed Assigned Counsel Office, Ronald W Lowe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Adams v. USA
as 2:2024cv10717
Petitioner: Raymond W. Adams
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Nirenberg v. Couzens, Lansky, Fealk, Roeder & Lazar, PC et al
as 2:2024cv10619
Plaintiff: Henry Nirenberg
Defendant: COUZENS, LANSKY, FEALK, ROEDER & LAZAR, P.C.,, Jack S Couzens, SADECKI & ASSOCIATES, P.L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104 Recovery of Benefits to Employee
Dobronski v. Labovick & Labovick, P.A.
as 4:2024cv10561
Plaintiff: Mark W. Dobronski
Defendant: Labovick & Labovick, P.A. Doing business as Labovick Law Group
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?