Cases 21 - 30 of 30
A.T. v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv04146
Plaintiff:
A.T.
Defendant:
The City of New York , Jamil Payne, Police Officers John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
A.T. et al v. New York City Department of Education
as 1:2011cv09177
Plaintiff:
A.T.
Defendant:
New York City Department of Education
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
A.T. Kearney, Inc. v. Global Crossing Telecommunications, Inc.
as 1:2011cv05035
Plaintiff:
A.T. Kearney, Inc.
Defendant:
Global Crossing Telecommunications, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kathryn Fee Architect v. Cochran et al
as 2:2011cv02407
Defendant:
Bruce A.T. Siska Architects PLLC, Diane Cochran and Bruce A.T Siska
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Fee Architect
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
A.T. v. New York City Department of Education
as 1:2011cv02874
Plaintiff:
A.T.
Defendant:
New York City Department of Education
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
HDI Gerling Industrie Versicherung AG v. A.T. Massey Coal Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv06735
Petitioner:
HDI Gerling Industrie Versicherung AG
Respondent:
A.T. Massey Coal Company, Inc., Massey Energy Company, Inc. and Central West Virginia Coal Company
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv02917
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2010cv02917
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Miller v. Bradley et al
as 9:2009cv01035
Plaintiff:
James Hardy Miller
Defendant:
J. Bradley, A.T. Ramirez and William Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Bradley et al
as 1:2009cv07646
Plaintiff:
James Hardy Miller
Defendant:
J. Bradley, A.T. Ramirez and William Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
