Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Al Otro Lado et al v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 2:2020cv05191
Plaintiff: Edwin F. Mandel Legal Aid Clinic and Al Otro Lado
Defendant: Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security and Customs and Border Protection
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Al Otro Lado, et al v. Chad Wolf, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-56417
Plaintiff / Appellee: VICTORIA DOE, MARIA DOE, JOSE DOE and others
Defendant / Appellant: TODD C. OWEN, Executive Assistant Commissioner, Office of Field Operations, United States Customs and Border Protection, in his official capacity, MARK A. MORGAN, Acting Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection and CHAD F. WOLF, Acting Secretary, US Department of Homeland Security
SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2019cv03438
Defendant: U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Plaintiff: Al Otro Lado, Inc., SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER and AL OTRO LADO, INC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
East Bay Sanctuary Covenant, et al v. William Barr, et al
as 19-16773
Defendant / Appellant: MATTHEW ALBENCE, Acting Director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, in his official capacity, JOHN P. SANDERS, Acting Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection, in his official capacity, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: CENTRAL AMERICAN RESOURCE CENTER, INNOVATION LAW LAB, EAST BAY SANCTUARY COVENANT and others
Amicus Curiae: FORMER NATIONAL SECURITY OFFICALS, NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS, KIDS IN NEED OF DEFENSE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2019cv01546
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794
East Bay Sanctuary Covenant, et al v. William Barr, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-16487
Defendant / Appellant: MATTHEW ALBENCE, Acting Director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, in his official capacity, JOHN P. SANDERS, Acting Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection, in his official capacity, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: CENTRAL AMERICAN RESOURCE CENTER, INNOVATION LAW LAB, EAST BAY SANCTUARY COVENANT and others
Amicus Curiae: PROFESSORS OF IMMIGRATION LAW, STATE OF ARIZONA and IMMIGRATION REFORM LAW INSTITUTE
Plaintiff v. Defendant Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv04073
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Innovation Law Lab, et al v. Kevin McAleenan, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-15716
Defendant / Appellant: TODD C. OWEN, Executive Assistant Commissioner, Office of Field Operations, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, in his official capacity, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, KIRSTJEN NIELSEN, Secretary of Homeland Security, in her official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: TAHIRIH JUSTICE CENTER, INNOVATION LAW LAB, CENTRAL AMERICAN RESOURCE CENTER OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA and others
Innovation Law Lab et al v. Nielsen et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv00807
Defendant: John Lafferty, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Lee Francis Cissna and others
Plaintiff: Tahirih Justice Center, Innovation Law Lab, Immigration and Deportation Defense Clinic at the University of San Francisco School of Law and others
Amicus Curiae: Immigration Reform Law Institute
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv06810
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?