Cases 21 - 30 of 94,216
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00983
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00369
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00993
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Diaz Martinez v. Pho Saigon Pearl, LLC
as 1:2024cv00997
Plaintiff:
Jose Misael Diaz Martinez
Defendant:
Pho Saigon Pearl, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Benson et al
as 2:2024cv00368
Plaintiff:
Charlene Ann Benson and Sam Edward Benson
Defendant:
Social Security Administration and SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Gadrow et al v. Bluegreen Vacations Unlimited, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Robert Gadrow and Amy Wright
Defendant:
Bluegreen Vacations Unlimited, Inc. and Hilton Grand Vacations, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
PotomacWave Consulting, Inc. v. Harford
as 1:2024cv00584
Plaintiff:
PotomacWave Consulting, Inc.
Defendant:
Robert Michael Harford
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Reilly v. Suitebriar, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00570
Plaintiff:
Bevan Reilly
Defendant:
Suitebriar, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ali v. Schweiner et al
as 1:2024cv00897
Plaintiff:
Kazim Ali
Defendant:
Carl Schweiner, Carrie Poulin, Robert Poulin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Goodman v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 1:2024cv00944
Plaintiff:
Thomas L. Goodman
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
