Cases 21 - 30 of 81,080
Shippley v. loanDepot.com, LLC
as 2:2024cv00813
Plaintiff:
Patricia Shippley
Defendant:
loanDepot.com, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Leary v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv05448
Plaintiff:
Shannon Leary
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Winterer v. United States
as 2:2024cv00195
Plaintiff:
Jared Anthony Winterer
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arneson v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America
as 2:2024cv00809
Plaintiff:
Shawna Arneson
Defendant:
Unum Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362 ERISA
Thatcher et al v. BAF Transport Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv05444
Plaintiff:
Larry Thatcher and Karen Thatcher
Defendant:
BAF Transport Inc., En K. Khai, Pat Doe Khai and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Benshoof v. Ferguson et al
as 2:2024cv00808
Plaintiff:
Kurt A Benshoof
Defendant:
Marshall Ferguson, J Doe, Blair M Russ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Maddox v. United Network for Organ Sharing et al
as 2:2024cv00811
Plaintiff:
Arthur Maddox
Defendant:
United Network for Organ Sharing and Swedish Health Services doing business as Swedish Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00806
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00810
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00807
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
