Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Addison v. Ace Cash Express, Inc.
as 1:2014cv01784
Defendant:
Ace Cash Express, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Levora Addison
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661
Addison et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2013dp20616
Plaintiff:
John Addison and Danette Addison
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Alexander v. Payne et al
as 1:2013cv00133
Plaintiff:
Addison Alexander
Defendant:
Payne, Salisbury and Hobberson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alexander v. Payne et al
as 1:2013cv00016
Plaintiff:
Addison Alexander
Defendant:
Payne, Hubbard and Salsbury
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
May v. Stonewall et al
as 1:2012cv00374
Plaintiff:
Adam May
Defendant:
Addison Stonewall , Clinton County Sheriff's Department and Clinton County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunmore v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2012cv00023
Plaintiff:
Addison Dunmore
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hartford Life Insurance Company v. Jarvis et al
as 5:2011cv02767
Plaintiff:
Hartford Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Inez Jarvis, Vickie Murnyack, Gregory Jarvis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Addison et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 1:2011dp21855
Plaintiff:
Alice Addison and John Addison
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Addison v. Smith
as 1:2010cv02512
Petitioner:
Aaron Addison
Respondent:
Keith Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Addison v. Baxter International, Inc. et al
as 1:2010hc60158
Plaintiff:
Mary Addison
Defendant:
Baxter International, Inc., Scientific Protein Laboratories, Inc., Changzou SPL Company, LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
