Cases 21 - 30 of 101
Trademark Holder Identified in Exhibit 1 v. Does 1-423, As Identified in Exhibit 2
as 1:2022cv04039
Plaintiff:
Trademark Holder Identified in Exhibit 1 and Ryder Clips Unlimited, Inc.
Defendant:
Does 1-423, As Identified in Exhibit 2, Aumbaram, miltacusa and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Unicolors, Inc. v. Bijora, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02824
Plaintiff:
Unicolors, Inc.
Defendant:
Bijora, Inc. an Illinois corporation doing business as Akira and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
USA v. Douglas Hirano
as 22-10011
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DOUGLAS AKIRA HIRANO
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00946
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00907
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Crocs, Inc. v. Bijora, Inc. d/b/a Akira
as 1:2021cv03698
Plaintiff:
Crocs, Inc.
Defendant:
Bijora, Inc. d/b/a Akira and Bijora, Inc. doing business as Akira
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
Claire Hickey, et al v. University of Pittsburgh
as 21-2013
Defendant / Appellee:
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CANDACE N. GRAHAM, AKIRA KIRKPATRICK, NICHOLAS BOWES and others
Akira Edmonds v. Dana Meyer, et al
as 21-1093
Defendant / Appellee:
T. Crouch, Nurse Practitioner, Dana Meyer, Michele Buckner, Warden of the South Central Correctional Center and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Akira Edmonds
USA v. Douglas Hirano
as 20-10395
Defendant / Appellant:
DOUGLAS AKIRA HIRANO, AKA Kevin Higashi
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Abe v. Seyak Corp. et al
as 2:2020cv05631
Plaintiff:
Hisami Abe
Defendant:
Yasuko Yamaguchi, Seyak Corp. doing business as Restaurant Yamaguchi and Akira Yamaguchi
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
