Cases 21 - 30 of 63
Kirk v. United States of America
as 4:2020cv00156
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Alexander Kirk
Interested Party:
Jack Dusthimer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Lajeunesse v. Larson
as 1:2020cv00039
Petitioner:
Michael Alexander Lajeunesse
Respondent:
Jeremy Larson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Alexander v. Wirtz et al
as 3:2020cv00016
Defendant:
Erin Cullen and Leslie Wirtz
Plaintiff:
Corey L Alexander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alexander et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 4:2020cv00044
Plaintiff:
Aaron Gallick, Robert Nerem, Jeffrey Postma and others
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Wells Fargo & Company Salary Continuation Pay Plan and Wells Fargo & Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Acosta v. Isla Pacifico, LLC et al
as 4:2019cv00016
Defendant:
El Tapatio, LLC, Isla Pacifico, LLC and Jesus Herrera
Plaintiff:
Secretary of Labor R. Alexander Acosta and United States Department of Labor
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Kozak v. Wachtendorf
as 4:2018cv00481
Petitioner:
Alexander Kozak
Interested Party:
Kevin Cmelik
Respondent:
Patti Wachtendorf
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis v. United States of America
as 4:2018cv00444
Petitioner:
Thomas Alexander Davis, III
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Schank v. State of Iowa
as 4:2018cv00411
Interested Party:
William A Hill
Defendant:
State of Iowa
Plaintiff:
Alexander Schank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haire v. McKinney et al
as 4:2017cv00351
Plaintiff:
Michael Haire
Defendant:
Jim McKinney, Jeremy Pullem, Kate Deal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Acosta v. Aviation Consultant Expert Solutions LLC et al
as 5:2017cv04041
Plaintiff:
R Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Aviation Consultant Expert Solutions LLC, TMX Aero LLC, 1 Vision Aviation PLLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
