Cases 21 - 30 of 38
Citigroup Mortgage Loan Trust Inc. v. Gomez et al
as 3:2013cv02319
Plaintiff:
Citigroup Mortgage Loan Trust Inc.
Defendant:
Alfredo Gomez and Gloria Gomez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
USA v. Pedro Alvarez-Sanchez
as 13-10224
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
PEDRO ALVAREZ-SANCHEZ, AKA Alfredo Gomez
Klein v. Palm Beach County et al
as 9:2012cv81348
Plaintiff:
Elexia Klein
Defendant:
Palm Beach County and Alfredo Gomez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alfredo Gomez et al v. Matthew Cate et al
as 2:2008cv04615
Plaintiff:
Abasta, Luis Aparicio, John Berry and others
Defendant:
S. Arriola, M. Askari, C. R. Carson and others
Unknown:
Mina K Choi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Espitia v. East Side Brickoven Pizza, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv06029
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Gomez Espitia
Defendant:
East Side Brickoven Pizza, Inc. and Emin Cekic
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
U.S. Bank, National Association v. Gomez et al
as 1:2012cv04613
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank, National Association
Defendant:
Maria A Gomez and Alfredo Gomez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Contreras v. Thaler
as 1:2011cv00106
Petitioner:
Alfredo Gomez Contreras
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gomez v. McDonald et al
as 2:2011cv00649
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Gomez
Defendant:
Mike McDonald, D Davey, R.L. Gower and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Gomez et al
as 1:2010cv02249
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Jose Alfredo Gomez and Silvia C. Gomez
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
Gomez et al v. Tedeschi et al
as 1:2010cv06845
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Gomez , Marcelino Alcantar and Marcelino Cantor
Defendant:
Jamie Tedeschi and United Masonry Restoration, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
