Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Rice-Lyles v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation (AMTRAK)
as 1:2018cv00876
Plaintiff:
Helen Rice-Lyles
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation (AMTRAK)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Taribi v. Tevis et al
as 1:2018cv00806
Plaintiff:
Ebenezar Taribi
Defendant:
Joshua Paul Tevis and National Railroad Passenger Corporation (AMTRAK)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kirkpatrick v. AMTRAK (Auto Train)
as 8:2018cv00418
Plaintiff:
Brenda Kirkpatrick
Defendant:
AMTRAK (Auto Train)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roundtree v. Amtrak National Railroad Passenger Corp
as 1:2016cv03418
Plaintiff:
Yvonne Roundtree
Defendant:
Amtrak National Railroad Passenger Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moore v. Amtrak et al
as 1:2016cv03015
Plaintiff:
Bessie N. Moore
Defendant:
Amtrak National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rugamba v. Rockledge Bus (Tour), Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv03948
Plaintiff:
Martin Rugamba
Defendant:
Rockledge Bus (Tour), Inc., Rockledge Bus (Tour), Inc. Supervisor, MTA Police Officer 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Gilani v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, d/b/a AMTRAK
as 8:2015cv02088
Plaintiff:
Diane Gilani
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, d/b/a AMTRAK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Witham et al v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation (AMTRAK)
as 1:2015cv02092
Plaintiff:
Gibbuda Witham and Mansi Mehta Witham
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation (AMTRAK)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kim et al v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation (AMTRAK)
as 1:2015cv01925
Plaintiff:
Jae-Yeon Kim and Sangyoon Nathan Park
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation (AMTRAK)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv01666
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
