Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv02331
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Rodriguez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2012cv00977
Plaintiff:
Antonia Rodriguez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE - FILE IN CONSOLIDATED LEAD CASE 09-2092 (FAB)
as 3:2010cv02059
Defendant:
RYTTSA, MAPFRE/PRAICO Insurance Company, Astra Oil Trading Limited, NV and others
Plaintiff:
Jorge Ferrer-Perez, Neydiana Garcia Felix, Jose Vargas-Vega and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ALVAREZ-ESTRADA et al
as 3:2010cv01065
Plaintiff:
EDWIN ALVAREZ-ESTRADA, LUIS AYALA-QUINTANA, GISEL BETANCES DE JESUS and others
Defendant:
WILFREDO ALEMANY-NORIEGA, MAYRA LOPEZ-CARRERO, Yanitsia Irizarry-Mendez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Mahomedalid Zuniga Santos, et al v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 09-73185
Petitioner:
MAHOMEDALID ZUNIGA SANTOS and MARIA ANTONIA RODRIGUEZ PLAZOLA
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Rodriguez v. Candid Home Care, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv21896
Plaintiff:
Maria Antonia Rodriguez
Defendant:
Candid Home Care, Inc. and Osvaldo Artigas
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Maria Antonia Rodriguez-Parede v. Eric H. Holder Jr.
as 08-73867
Petitioner:
MARIA ANTONIA RODRIGUEZ-PAREDES
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Correa-Ruiz, et al v. Calderon-Serra, et al
as 06-2578
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARMELO CORREA-RUIZ, Former Colonel, EVELYN ROY-BONILLA, AILEEN MARIE CORREA-ROY and others
Movant:
DANIEL GARCIA and JOSE CORTES MALDONADO
Intervenor - Appellant:
ANGEL GABRIEL ROMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
SILA M. CALDERON-SERRA, AGUSTIN CARTAGENA-DIAZ, VICTOR M. RIVERA-GONZALEZ and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
