Cases 21 - 30 of 32
USA v. Antonio Espinoza-Torre
as 13-15660
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ANTONIO ESPINOZA-TORRES, AKA Tonio, AKA Alberto Torres-Mendoza
Antonio Espinoza-Alcala v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 12-72623
Petitioner:
ANTONIO ESPINOZA-ALCALA
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Flores et al v. Astoria Car Wash Hi-Tek 10 Minute Lube Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv03531
Defendant:
Astoria Car Wash Hi-Tek 10 Minute Lube Inc., Lana, Max and others
Plaintiff:
Josue Clodomiro Gomez Camargo, Juan Antonio Espinoza, Hector Segundo Tenemaz Flores and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Bravo v. United States of America
as 4:2011cv00519
Petitioner:
Antonio Espinoza Bravo
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Chavez et al v. Dole Food Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv01300
Defendant:
Dole Food Company, Inc., Dole Fresh Fruit Company, Standard Fruit Company and others
Plaintiff:
Tobias Bermudez Chavez , Gerardo Antonio Fonseca Torres , Franklin Guillen Salazar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
National Organization of Assistance for Homeowners of California v. Aurora Loan Services LLC et al
as 8:2011cv00578
Plaintiff:
Zuhey Aparicio, Guillermo Aquino, Bruce Bahn and others
Defendant:
Aurora Loan Services LLC and Does
Lincoln Moody v. USA
as 10-14758
Petitioner - Appellant:
LINCOLN MOODY, a.k.a. Antonio Espinoza, a.k.a. Jose
Respondent - Appellee:
USA
Watkins v. Guest Properties et al
as 2:2010cv01298
Plaintiff:
Chester Watkins
Defendant:
Guest Properties, Jerome Houston, Antonio Espinoza and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States v. Antonio Bravo
as 10-1380
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Antonio Espinoza Bravo
Fredy Espinoza v. Eric H. Holder Jr.
as 08-73101
Petitioner:
FREDY ANTONIO ESPINOZA
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
