Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Smith v. United States Marshal Agency et al
as 4:2007cv01747
Petitioner:
Danny Louis Smith
Respondent:
United States Marshal Agency and United States Attorney General Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lowe v. Jones et al
as 2:2007cv01505
Plaintiff:
David Wayne Lowe
Defendant:
Kennth Jones and Attorney General Office State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lipscomb v. Culliver et al
as 2:2007cv01482
Plaintiff:
Antoine M Lipscomb
Defendant:
Grant Culliver and Attorney General Office State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Young v. Copes et al
as 2:2007cv01260
Plaintiff:
John Spencer Young
Defendant:
Gary Copes, Stephen Bullard and Attorney General Office State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sinquefield v. Davenport et al
as 1:2007cv01008
Plaintiff:
David Eugene Sinquefield
Defendant:
Davenport and Attorney General Office State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hurst v. Mitchem et al
as 1:2007cv00973
Plaintiff:
Robbie Leon Hurst
Defendant:
Billy Mitchem and Attorney General Office State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Allen v. Owens et al
as 2:2007cv00711
Petitioner:
Jerry Allen
Respondent:
Robert Owens, Chris Curry and Attorney General Office State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:1994cv00356
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cross_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Movant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cross_claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
