Cases 21 - 30 of 58
Does v. Lawrence Wasden, et al
as 19-35391
Defendant / Appellee:
JOE RODRIGUEZ, Nez Perce County Sheriff, MATTHEW THOMAS, Sheriff, Sexual Offender Management Board, CRAIG T. ROWLAND, Bingham County Sheriff and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DOES, John and Jane, 1-134
Bannock County v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 1:2019cv00151
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Amerisourcebergen Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Bannock County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Copeland v. Bannock County, Idaho et al
as 4:2019cv00089
Defendant:
Tom Sellers, State of Idaho Attorney General, Bannock County, Idaho and others
Plaintiff:
Dan Copeland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Jensen v. Bannock County Sheriff's Department
as 4:2019cv00039
Plaintiff:
Angel Cherie Jensen
Defendant:
Bannock County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Branch v. Bannock County Sheriff
as 4:2018cv00493
Respondent:
Bannock County Sheriff
Petitioner:
Malachi A Branch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Holmes v. Bannock County Jail
as 4:2018cv00445
Petitioner:
Steven Ivan Holmes
Respondent:
Bannock County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Clyne v. Ada County Sheriff et al
as 1:2017cv00492
Plaintiff:
Heath Thomas Clyne
Defendant:
Ada County Sheriff, Bannock County Sheriff, Nampa Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clyne v. Peck et al
as 1:2017cv00476
Plaintiff:
Heath Thomas Clyne
Defendant:
Gregory Peck, Bannock County, Pocatello Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jason VanOrden v. Bannock County, et al
as 16-35845
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASON VANORDEN
Defendant - Appellee:
BANNOCK COUNTY, CITY OF POCATELLO, LOREN NIELSEN, Sheriff and others
Sittre v. Bannock County 6th District Court et al
as 4:2016cv00375
Plaintiff:
Jonnine Sittre
Defendant:
Bannock County 6th District Court, Naftz, John Souza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
