Cases 21 - 30 of 30
BENEFIELD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv22979
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER BENEFIELD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00498
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BENEFIELD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03911
Defendant:
AERO HOLDING LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AERO INTERMEDIATE LLC and others
Plaintiff:
STEVE BENEFIELD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHINN v. CLEMMONS et al
as 3:2019cv03381
Defendant:
RACHEL C CARTLER, NATHANIEL R MORGAN, P RODRIGUEZ and others
Plaintiff:
LAVON R SHINN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALEXANDER et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03193
Plaintiff:
PHILIP CALLIGAN, ASHLEY RIVERA, JAMES P. MCCOOL and others
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LAND et al v. ROBERTS et al
as 5:2019cv00120
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BAXTER, KENNETH SHAW, TYLER LAND and others
Defendant:
TREVOR LEE, SHERIFF LOUIS S ROBERTS, III, ZACHARY WESTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALLACE v. BENEFIELD et al
as 3:2017cv00842
Petitioner:
Joe Lewis Wallace, Jr.
Respondent:
D Benefield, H Douglas and B Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALLACE v. BENEFIELD et al
as 4:2017cv00284
Plaintiff:
JOE LEWIS WALLACE, JR
Defendant:
D BENEFIELD, H DOUGLAS and B ROGERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benefield v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 8:2013cv02954
Plaintiff:
Dennis Benefield
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Burlison v. Williams et al
as 5:2012cv00560
Plaintiff:
Terry A Burlison
Defendant:
Sarah Ritterhoff Williams , Jeffery W. Benefield , Cassandra K. Benefield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
