Cases 21 - 30 of 76
Watkins v. City of Covington, Georgia et al
as 1:2021cv04365
Plaintiff:
Warren Cortiss and Barbara Watkins
Defendant:
City of Covington, Georgia, Officer Kinsley Nichols, Officer Brandon Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv52358
Plaintiff:
BRANDON DAVIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv45863
Plaintiff:
BRANDON DAVIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ross et al v. Cohen et al
as 1:2021cv03447
Plaintiff:
Lisa Ross, Jerrod Howard, Marcos Olinyk and others
Defendant:
Benjamin Cohen and Charles Lively
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv36611
Plaintiff:
BRANDON DAVIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Brandon Davis
as 21-1690
Defendant / Appellant:
BRANDON DAVIS, AKA IN_SAVAGEMODE
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02099
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv07752
Plaintiff:
BRANDON DAVIS
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis et al v. City Of Cincinnati et al
as 1:2021cv00080
Defendant:
Weston Voss, City Of Cincinnati and Emily Heine
Plaintiff:
Nicole Davis and Brandon Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Studio Peyo S.A. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2021cv00293
Plaintiff:
Studio Peyo S.A.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", ZheJiangHangShiDianQiYouXianGongSi, Shop911060156 Store and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
