Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00272
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Ponder v. Wersant et al
as 4:2017cv00537
Plaintiff:
Brian Lamar Ponder
Defendant:
Paul Gerard Wersant, Coury Matthews Jacocks, James E. Albertelli, P.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ponder v. Knight et al
as 1:2017cv00028
Plaintiff:
Brian Lamar Ponder
Defendant:
Patricia A. Knight , Larry Kerman , Residential Credit Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ponder v. Prophete
as 1:2016cv01043
Plaintiff:
Brian Lamar Ponder
Defendant:
Donald Sony Prophete
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 t Diversity-Torts
Ponder v. Ally Financial Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv07026
Defendant:
Ally Financial Inc., William Thomas Collins, Sal Frank Deluca and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Lamar Ponder
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02458
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jones v. Chicago Police Department 15th Dist. et al
as 1:2013cv05504
Plaintiff:
Brian Lamar Jones
Defendant:
Chicago Police Department 15th Dist., Two Investigtive Detectives out of 15th Dist. and Two Police Officers out of 15th Dist.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brian Brown v. State of Nevada, et al
as 13-16435
Petitioner - Appellant:
BRIAN LAMAR BROWN
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF NEVADA, RICK WALKER and BILL DONAT
Lawson, Sr. v. Demings et al
as 6:2011cv01236
Plaintiff:
Brian Lamar Lawson, Sr.
Defendant:
Mark Watkins, Thomas Lassiter, Vernon Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brian Lamar Love v. City of Buena Park et al
as 8:2010cv01897
Defendant:
City of Buena Park, DOES, S Holliday and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Lamar Love
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
