Cases 21 - 30 of 107
Alticor Inc. et al v. Herbal Bridge Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00927
Plaintiff:
Alticor Inc. and Amway Corp.
Defendant:
Herbal Bridge Inc. and Hanliang Zhu
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Bridges #437651 v. Rewerts
as 1:2021cv00920
Petitioner:
Antonio Vallin Bridges #437651
Respondent:
Randee Rewerts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bridges #437651 v. Michigan Parole Board et al
as 1:2021cv00678
Petitioner:
Antonio Vallin Bridges #437651
Respondent:
Michigan Parole Board and Randee Rewerts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bridges #437651 v. Rewerts
as 1:2021cv00558
Respondent:
Randee Rewerts
Petitioner:
Antonio Vallin Bridges #437651
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Linihan v. USAA Casualty Insurance Company et al
as 1:2021cv00359
Defendant:
Priority Health Point of Service Plan, Equian, LLC, Covered Bridge Healthcare of St. Joseph County, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew D Linihan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Azzarmi v. Sedgwick Claims Management Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv10074
Defendant:
John Buehler, Covent Bridge (USA ) Inc., QBE Holdings Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Aasir Azzarmi
Bridges #437651 v. Michigan Parole Board Members et al
as 1:2020cv01138
Plaintiff:
Antonio Vallin Bridges #437651
Defendant:
Michigan Parole Board Members and Michigan Department of Corrections Director
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bridges #437651 v. Rewerts
as 1:2020cv01130
Respondent:
Richard Lee Rewerts and Randee Rewerts
Petitioner:
Antonio Vallin Bridges #437651
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mease #213302 v. Washington et. al.
as 2:2020cv00176
Plaintiff:
John Eugene Mease #213302 and Shakur Muhammad
Defendant:
Unknown Dye, Unknown Yon, R. Batho and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bridges #437651 v. Michigan Parole Board
as 1:2020cv00483
Respondent:
Michigan Parole Board
Petitioner:
Antonio Vallin Bridges #437651
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
