Cases 21 - 30 of 70
Parker v. Burg et al
as 1:2017cv05177
Plaintiff:
Rayvon E Parker
Defendant:
Burg, Zydek and Diane Cannon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Casey et al v. Denton et al
as 3:2017cv00521
Plaintiff:
Jessica Casey , Melody Edwards and Debbie Foster
Defendant:
Roger C. Denton, Schlichter, Bogard & Denton, L.L.P., Michael S. Burg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Mack v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2017cv03302
Plaintiff:
Terrence Mack
Defendant:
City Of Chicago , Rahm Emanuel, Richard M Daily and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Horton v. Butler et al
as 1:2017cv01368
Plaintiff:
Eugene Horton
Defendant:
Kimberly Butler, Vonetta Harris, Jon Burge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRASHER et al v. Quincy Properties LLC, doing business as Welcome Inn et al
as 3:2017cv03022
Plaintiff:
APRIL R. BRASHER and RICHARD M. ORENCIA
Defendant:
Quincy Properties LLC, doing business as Welcome Inn, Welcome Inn Hotel Management, Inc., Brett Burge and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Garrit et al v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2016cv07319
Plaintiff:
Susie Garrit , Unique Hatchet , Domoneec Harris and others
Defendant:
City Of Chicago , Matthew O'Brien, James Bansley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hinton v. Burge et al
as 1:2016cv05743
Plaintiff:
Leonard Hinton
Defendant:
Jon Burge, Thomas Kripple, Leonard Bajenski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Burge et al
as 1:2016cv03404
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Smith
Defendant:
Jon Burge, Richard M Daley, John Byrne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ollie v. Chicago Police Dept. et al
as 1:2016cv01643
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Ollie
Defendant:
Chicago Police Dept., Burge and Jentile
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mogell v. Calhoun et al
as 1:2015cv01239
Plaintiff:
Rosalee Mogell
Defendant:
David L. Calhoun, Daniel M. Dickinson, Juan Gallardo and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
