Cases 21 - 30 of 78
McConico v. Babers et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00195
Defendant:
Moses Moseley, Sharon Brown and Gwendolyn Babers
Plaintiff:
James McConico, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Broadhead v. Gay et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv00150
Defendant:
Brian Wilson, Gwendolyn Babers, Eleval Hayes and others
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00035
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 rt
Broadhead v. Holcey et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv00021
Defendant:
A. McClain, J. Ellis, B. McCorvey and others
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Richie et al (INMATE 2) (LEAD)
as 2:2019cv00011
Defendant:
Warden McClain, Wexford Health Care, Gwendolyn Babers and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Adams
Consolidated Defendant:
Mary Collins, Mr. Turner, Ms. Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Richie et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv00012
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Wexford Health Care, Captain Lamar and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Babers et al (INMATE 1)(MEMBER)
as 2:2019cv00016
Defendant:
Mr. Boyd, Mary Collins, Alabama Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitt v. McClain et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2018cv00990
Defendant:
Warden Babers, Lt. Jones, Warden McClain and others
Plaintiff:
Heath Whitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitt v. McClain et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2018cv00991
Defendant:
Warden Babers, Warden McClain and Patrice Richie
Plaintiff:
Heath Whitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gardner v. Dunn et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2018cv00959
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Bullock Correctional Facility, Gwendolyn Babers and others
Plaintiff:
Corey J. Gardner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
