Cases 21 - 30 of 53
Barber v. Chief Judge Special Court of Appeals et al
as 1:2017cv00554
Plaintiff:
Ellis Barber
Defendant:
Chief Judge Special Court of Appeals, Howard County Circuit Court, Howard County Dist Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gladden, Sr. v. Barber et al
as 8:2016cv01257
Petitioner:
Thomas Earl Gladden, Sr.
Respondent:
Matt Barber and The Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Barber v. Laurel City
as 1:2016cv00915
Plaintiff:
Ellis Harley Barber
Defendant:
Laurel City
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Barber v. United States President et al
as 1:2016cv00903
Plaintiff:
Ellis Barber
Defendant:
United States President, United States Congress, United States House of Representatives and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Barber v. Maryland Transportation Authority
as 1:2015cv03019
Plaintiff:
Ellis Harley Barber
Defendant:
Maryland Transportation Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Barber v. President of United States et al
as 1:2015cv02048
Plaintiff:
Ellis Harley Barber
Defendant:
President of United States and Gangle of Thuggies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barber v. Washington Department of the Navy et al
as 8:2015cv01309
Plaintiff:
Nicole Barber
Defendant:
Washington Department of the Navy and Walter Reed National Military Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 22 U.S.C. § 2702
DACO Construction Co., Inc. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company et al
as 1:2015cv00995
Plaintiff:
DACO Construction Co., Inc.
Defendant:
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Jay H Bruce and Paul D Barber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cohen et al v. Rosenstein et al
as 1:2014cv03996
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Cohen, Damien Riley, Christopher Palmer and others
Defendant:
Rod Rosenstein, Harry Gruber, Joyce McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
