Cases 21 - 30 of 70
Barton v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv01914
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Lisa Barton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barton v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv01136
Plaintiff:
Dany Barton
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rippl et al v. United States Department of State
as 1:2020cv00289
Defendant:
Supervisor Jeremy Doe, National Passport Center and United States Department of State
Plaintiff:
Barton H. Rippl
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Seaman v. Seneca County/Board of County Commissioners et al
as 3:2019cv02962
Defendant:
Sheriff William E. Eckelberry, Officer Branson, Officer B Brooks and others
Plaintiff:
Michele Seaman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv02721
Plaintiff:
Brinda Bradley, Deatirce Digman, Brenda A. Woods and others
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Good v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv04951
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Barton Good
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
International Watchman Inc. v. Barton Watchbands Holdco, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv02310
Defendant:
NATO Hardware, Barton Watchbands Holdco, LLC, Liquid Lady Productions, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
International Watchman Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Rippl v. United States Department of State et al
as 1:2019cv02155
Respondent:
United States Department of State and Supervisor Jeremy Doe
Petitioner:
Barton H. Rippl
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Barton v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv03985
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Barbarita Barton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01776
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Undetermined:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
