Cases 21 - 30 of 51
Josenhans v. Sourcefire, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv02332
Plaintiff:
Michaels Josenhans
Defendant:
Sourcefire, Inc. , John C. Becker , Martin F. Roesch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Vukosa v. Sourcefire, Inc., et al.
as 1:2013cv02271
Plaintiff:
Michael Vukosa
Defendant:
Sourcefire, Inc. , John C. Becker , Martin F. Roesch and others
Consol_plaintiff:
Michaels Josenhans and Robert Collier
Consol_defendant:
Acquisition Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv02646
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Becker v. Clarke et al
as 8:2012cv01214
Plaintiff:
Stephen J. Becker
Defendant:
Toni E. Clarke and Marvin Liss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Becker v. Liss et al
as 1:2012cv00865
Plaintiff:
Stephen Becker
Defendant:
Marvin Liss and Toni E. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schwartz v. Quinones et al
as 1:2012cv00570
Plaintiff:
Richard Denis Schwartz, III
Defendant:
Latanya Quinones and Perry Becker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Becker v. Corizon Medical Services et al
as 8:2011cv03650
Plaintiff:
Brian C. Becker
Defendant:
Corizon Medical Services, Gary D. Maynard, Solomon Hejiriko, Sr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McNeil v. State of Maryland et al
as 8:2011cv02495
Plaintiff:
Michael A. McNeil
Defendant:
State of Maryland , Howard County Maryland, Howard County Circuit Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jefferson v. Morgan et al
as 1:2011cv02066
Plaintiff:
Edward W. Jefferson
Defendant:
J. Phillip Morgan, Frank B. Bishop, Likin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mosby v. Thorne et al
as 1:2011cv02057
Plaintiff:
Kevin Ramon Mosby
Defendant:
Charles Thorne, Brett Burkett, Keith Muir and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
