Cases 21 - 30 of 58
Schuppan v. Cabell et al
as 7:2022cv00733
Petitioner:
George Zachary Schuppan
Respondent:
Beth Cabell and Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jonathan Harris, Sr. v. J. Sadler
as 22-7262
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHNATHAN A. HARRIS, SR. and JONATHAN A. HARRIS, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
J. SADLER, Human Service Administrator, MICHAEL D. BROOKS, Ordering Physician/Attending Physician, S. HILL, L.P.N. and others
Carter v. Cabell et al
as 1:2022cv01160
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Carter
Defendant:
Beth Cabell, Kevin McCoy, Joshua Branch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
McFadden, Jr. v. Clarke et al
as 1:2022cv01082
Plaintiff:
John Earl McFadden, Jr
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Beth Cabell and K. Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trent v. Cabell
as 7:2022cv00224
Petitioner:
Robert Blaine Trent
Respondent:
Beth Cabell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lester Lynch, Jr. v. Beth Cabell
as 22-6341
Petitioner / Appellant:
LESTER B. LYNCH, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
BETH CABELL
Robert Via, Jr. v. Beth Cabell
as 22-6182
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT KING VIA, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
BETH CABELL, Warden of Sussex II State Prison, OFFICER VANDERMARK and OFFICER R. JOHNSON
Vaazquez v. Cabell
as 7:2021cv00546
Petitioner:
Hector Escalante Vazquez and Hector Vasquez Escalante
Defendant:
Beth Cabell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Vaazquez v. Cabell
as 2:2021cv00548
Petitioner:
Hector Escalante Vazquez
Defendant:
Beth Cabell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dale Pughsley v. A. Robinson
as 21-7326
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DALE LEE PUGHSLEY, a/k/a Askari Danso MS Lumumba
Defendant / Appellee:
A. DAVID ROBINSON, Chief of Corrections, Each individually and in his official capacity, JAMILLA BURNEY-DIVINS, Each individually and in her official capacity, GREGORY HOLLOWAY, Each individually and in his official capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
