Cases 21 - 30 of 437
Ross v. Stain et al
as 1:2023cv00159
Plaintiff:
Robert Ross
Defendant:
Bill Stain, Latonia Young-Griffin, Caitlin Douglas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Toler v. Religious Accomodations Committee et al
as 4:2023cv01023
Plaintiff:
Norman Toler and al-Maliki al-Islam
Defendant:
Religious Accomodations Committee, Sex Offender Rehabilitation & Treatment Services and Bill Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gahagan v. Stange
as 3:2023cv05044
Petitioner:
Barry Gahagan
Respondent:
Bill Stange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Swims et al
as 1:2023cv00094
Plaintiff:
Mose S. Williams
Defendant:
Garret A. Swims, Phillip M. Dobbs, William H. Petty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Stange, et al
as 1:2023cv00091
Plaintiff:
Stanley Johnson
Defendant:
Bill Stange, Unknown Armstrong, Major Unknown Mayes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walther v. Stange
as 1:2023cv00067
Petitioner:
Shawn M. Walther
Respondent:
Bill Stange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mosley v. Stange
as 1:2023cv00068
Petitioner:
Devin Mosley
Respondent:
Bill Stange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Roper v. Missouri, State of et al
as 1:2023cv00065
Plaintiff:
Jason L. Roper
Defendant:
Missouri, State of, Michael E. Gans, Daniel F. Kellogg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chatman v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv00055
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Chatman
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections, Ann Precythe, Bill Stange and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wayne v. Stange
as 1:2023cv00053
Petitioner:
Montez R Wayne
Respondent:
Bill Stange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
