Cases 21 - 30 of 55
Blevins v. Foster
as 1:2023cv00002
Plaintiff:
Jerry Otha Blevins
Defendant:
Charles W. Foster, Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Riddick v. Rose et al
as 7:2023cv00072
Plaintiff:
Steve Riddick
Defendant:
Sgt. J. Rose, C/O T. Neece, C/O H. Nash and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DeFour v. White et al
as 7:2022cv00703
Plaintiff:
Jeremy DeFour
Defendant:
R. White, Blevins, C. King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Josiah-El-Bey v. Davis et al
as 7:2022cv00597
Plaintiff:
Delroy Josiah-El-Bey
Defendant:
Delroy Josiah, Carl A. Manis, Melvin C. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Royal v. Wallens Ridge State Prison et al
as 7:2022cv00506
Plaintiff:
Jarice L. Royal
Defendant:
Wallens Ridge State Prison, Red Onion State Prison, River North Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Roop et al
as 7:2022cv00258
Plaintiff:
David Wayne Anderson
Defendant:
Detective Brad Roop, Detective James Blevins, Lt. Karen Tolbert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blevins v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 7:2021cv00121
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Ronald Jean Blevins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pughsley v. Blevins et al
as 7:2020cv00599
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Blevins and A. David Robinson
Plaintiff:
Dale L. Pughsley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riddick v. Lambert et al
as 7:2020cv00448
Plaintiff:
Steve Riddick and Steven Riddick
Defendant:
Collins, Lambert, Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mabe v. Mediko et al
as 7:2019cv00860
Defendant:
Zack Grizzel, Major Parks, Stuart Scott and others
Plaintiff:
Jared D. Mabe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
